Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Smoke thrown on a map
2715.0371
Molotov damage (avg/round)
102
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
36171012
Player score (round)
37561012
Damage (total/round)
39273
Player score (round)
36691012
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
82%
Mirage
38%
Ancient
38%
Nuke
34%
Overpass
17%
Vertigo
17%
Inferno
9%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
22
Mirage
33%
9
9
Ancient
50%
4
14
Nuke
40%
10
6
Overpass
60%
5
2
Vertigo
67%
3
4
Inferno
60%
15
3
Last 5 maps
Dust II
82%
17
3
Mirage
71%
14
5
Ancient
88%
8
18
Nuke
74%
19
3
Overpass
43%
7
19
Vertigo
50%
2
24
Inferno
69%
26
2
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of YK vs IHC by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between YK and IHC, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by IHC. The MVP of this match was sk0R.
IHC analytics
The team IHC secured 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for IHC were sk0R contributed 35 kills and Annihilation contributed 28 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11343 overall damage.
On the defensive side, IHC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
YK analytics
The team YK managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for YK were salmon contributed 26 kills and zhokiNg contributed 27 kills. 10672 of total damage by YK could not prevent IHC from securing the victory
On the defensive side, YK struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments