0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
30%
Dust II
19%
Overpass
17%
Nuke
15%
Vertigo
11%
Inferno
6%
Ancient
2%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
33%
9
11
Dust II
54%
13
4
Overpass
67%
3
11
Nuke
50%
8
4
Vertigo
36%
11
4
Inferno
56%
36
0
Ancient
57%
7
2
Last 5 maps
Mirage
63%
48
2
Dust II
35%
20
15
Overpass
50%
24
15
Nuke
35%
17
16
Vertigo
25%
4
37
Inferno
62%
50
1
Ancient
59%
17
14
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlllw
- wlwwl
Info
Map Analysis of X vs Enterprise by the Bo3.gg Team
X on Inferno Analysis
X demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 0 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for X on Inferno were arbnorz, who contributed 22 kills, and cerber, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9595 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, X held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Enterprise on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Enterprise, as they managed to secure 24 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Enterprise on Inferno included h4rn, who contributed 19 kills, and system, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8100 total damage, Enterprise couldn't prevent X from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Enterprise struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments