WW Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

5

5

+18

142

4:0

8

0

10.0

+74%

15

6

4

+9

108

0:1

4

0

7.9

+51%

13

6

4

+7

77

1:0

5

1

7.7

+26%

11

8

5

+3

81

4:1

3

0

6.9

+13%

Total

71

33

20

+38

474

10:5

22

1

7.6

+35%

HOTU Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

10

14

2

-4

83

0:2

1

1

5.5

-16%

7

14

4

-7

68

1:1

1

0

5.1

-25%

5

14

1

-9

41

3:3

1

0

4.2

-46%

6

14

0

-8

53

1:2

1

0

4.2

-43%

5

15

0

-10

37

0:2

0

0

3.5

-44%

Total

33

71

7

-38

282

5:10

4

1

4.5

-35%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of WW vs HOTU by the Bo3.gg Team

WW on Anubis Analysis

WW demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 15 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for WW on Anubis were tried, who contributed 23 kills, and Jerry, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7103 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, WW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


HOTU on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for HOTU, as they managed to secure 2 out of 15 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for HOTU on Anubis included Re1GN, who contributed 10 kills, and lampada, who added 7 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4232 total damage, HOTU couldn't prevent WW from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, HOTU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date