0 Comments
96
109
38
-13
360
12:18
20
2
-5%
Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
74%
Dust II
50%
Inferno
43%
Vertigo
43%
Ancient
25%
Anubis
17%
Mirage
2%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
2
0
Dust II
50%
2
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Vertigo
75%
4
0
Ancient
25%
4
0
Anubis
43%
7
0
Mirage
60%
5
0
Last 5 maps
Nuke
74%
35
6
Dust II
0%
2
1
Inferno
43%
23
17
Vertigo
32%
31
19
Ancient
0%
0
73
Anubis
60%
78
0
Mirage
58%
36
20
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwll
- lwwww
Info
Map Analysis of WOPA vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
WOPA on Anubis Analysis
WOPA demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for WOPA on Anubis were Gnøffe, who contributed 27 kills, and Leakz, who added 25 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 11865 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, WOPA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis included nEMANHA, who contributed 26 kills, and simke, who added 22 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10802 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent WOPA from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments