0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:34s01:55s
Multikill x-
4
Player score (round)
38901011
Damage (total/round)
39173
Player score (round)
43641011
Player score (round)
36211011
Player score (round)
40331011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
83%
Vertigo
75%
Dust II
50%
Ancient
22%
Anubis
13%
Mirage
10%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
3
0
Vertigo
75%
4
0
Dust II
50%
2
0
Ancient
40%
5
0
Anubis
33%
9
0
Mirage
60%
5
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Nuke
83%
6
1
Vertigo
0%
1
6
Dust II
0%
0
1
Ancient
18%
11
1
Anubis
46%
13
0
Mirage
50%
4
1
Inferno
0%
1
3
Info
Match analysis of WOPA vs LEON by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between WOPA and LEON, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Nuke, Ancient, and victory was secured by LEON. The MVP of this match was Raijin.
LEON analytics
The team LEON secured 49 out of 94 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Nuke. They also successfully set 8 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LEON were Raijin contributed 67 kills and facecrack contributed 74 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 34835 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LEON held their ground firmly, successfully defending 27 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
WOPA analytics
The team WOPA managed to secure 45 out of 94 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 9 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for WOPA were Leakz contributed 66 kills and LUMSEN contributed 69 kills. 34216 of total damage by WOPA could not prevent LEON from securing the victory
On the defensive side, WOPA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 24 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments