0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.5986
Kills on a map
31.0216.7206
Damage (total/round)
49773
Player score (round)
41271010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Trades on a map
9.893.3972
Player score (round)
39511010
Player score (round)
35221010
Clutch (opponents)
3
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
60%
Nuke
42%
Inferno
19%
Mirage
12%
Anubis
7%
Ancient
6%
Vertigo
4%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
15
Nuke
42%
26
3
Inferno
38%
13
4
Mirage
42%
26
3
Anubis
43%
23
4
Ancient
57%
53
1
Vertigo
44%
9
3
Last 5 maps
Dust II
60%
35
2
Nuke
0%
1
27
Inferno
57%
42
1
Mirage
54%
28
6
Anubis
50%
34
11
Ancient
63%
35
6
Vertigo
48%
23
7
Info
Match analysis of WOPA vs kONO by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between WOPA and kONO, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Mirage, Ancient, Inferno, and victory was secured by WOPA. The MVP of this match was Leakz.
WOPA analytics
The team WOPA secured 34 out of 66 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Ancient. They also successfully set 10 bombs during the match.
The standout players for WOPA were Leakz contributed 60 kills and sL1m3 contributed 61 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 24969 overall damage.
On the defensive side, WOPA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
kONO analytics
The team kONO managed to secure 32 out of 66 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 10 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for kONO were amster contributed 54 kills and kensizor contributed 52 kills. 22511 of total damage by kONO could not prevent WOPA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, kONO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments