Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Deagle kills on a map
31.6558
AK47 kills on a map
116.5019
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
Assists on a map
14.084.4315
Speed Round (sec)
00:28s01:55s
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
64%
Dust II
58%
Inferno
50%
Nuke
47%
Mirage
10%
Anubis
9%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
64%
11
0
Dust II
58%
12
3
Inferno
50%
2
4
Nuke
47%
19
1
Mirage
40%
20
0
Anubis
31%
32
0
Ancient
33%
18
2
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
2
0
Mirage
50%
8
0
Anubis
40%
5
0
Ancient
33%
6
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllll
- wwlll
Info
Match analysis of WOPA vs HyperSpirit by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between WOPA and HyperSpirit, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by HyperSpirit. The MVP of this match was swiiffter.
HyperSpirit analytics
The team HyperSpirit secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for HyperSpirit were swiiffter contributed 16 kills and awks contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6796 overall damage.
On the defensive side, HyperSpirit held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
WOPA analytics
The team WOPA managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for WOPA were sL1m3 contributed 12 kills and Gnøffe contributed 10 kills. 5143 of total damage by WOPA could not prevent HyperSpirit from securing the victory
On the defensive side, WOPA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments