0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
41.8164
Deagle kills on a map
41.6558
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4482
Speed Round (sec)
00:27s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:33s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
42701010
Multikill x-
4
Knife kills
11
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
70%
Dust II
58%
Inferno
50%
Nuke
14%
Ancient
11%
Anubis
10%
Mirage
7%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
70%
10
0
Dust II
58%
12
2
Inferno
0%
1
2
Nuke
47%
17
1
Ancient
31%
13
1
Anubis
35%
26
0
Mirage
44%
18
0
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
27
Dust II
0%
0
0
Inferno
50%
6
6
Nuke
33%
9
13
Ancient
42%
12
5
Anubis
45%
11
10
Mirage
37%
19
5
Info
Match analysis of WOPA vs 500 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between WOPA and 500, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by 500. The MVP of this match was CeRq.
500 analytics
The team 500 secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 500 were CeRq contributed 26 kills and SHiPZ contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8952 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 500 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
WOPA analytics
The team WOPA managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for WOPA were sL1m3 contributed 20 kills and Vster contributed 19 kills. 7191 of total damage by WOPA could not prevent 500 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, WOPA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments