Wisla Krakow Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

12

4

+14

90

7:2

8

0

7.7

+36%

20

19

6

+1

91

4:1

4

0

6.8

+10%

19

21

5

-2

81

5:2

4

0

6.2

-6%

18

15

5

+3

74

0:2

4

1

5.9

+2%

13

13

8

0

55

4:0

2

0

5.7

-5%

Total

96

80

28

+16

391

20:7

22

1

6.4

+7%

Nemiga Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

20

7

0

70

2:4

6

2

6.1

+9%

17

19

4

-2

71

3:3

3

0

5.8

-7%

15

20

10

-5

71

1:3

3

0

5.5

-11%

14

15

1

-1

53

1:3

3

0

5.2

-15%

14

23

6

-9

71

0:7

2

0

4.9

-19%

Total

80

97

28

-17

336

7:20

17

2

5.5

-8%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Wisla Krakow vs Nemiga by the Bo3.gg Team

Wisla Krakow on Inferno Analysis

Wisla Krakow demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Wisla Krakow on Inferno were SZPERO, who contributed 26 kills, and phr, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10563 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Wisla Krakow held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Nemiga on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Nemiga, as they managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Nemiga on Inferno included 1eeR, who contributed 20 kills, and fostar, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9085 total damage, Nemiga couldn't prevent Wisla Krakow from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Nemiga struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date