0 Comments
54
69
20
-15
351
10:7
11
0
Inferno5.7
0%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3025
USP kills on a map
31.6107
AK47 kills on a map
136.6606
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3025
Assists on a map
9.544.3808
Trades on a map
7.383.4876
Speed Round (sec)
00:24s01:54s
Player score (round)
35341011
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
L
100%
Vertigo
0%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
1
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Match analysis of Wiff Check vs LOSTHILLS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Wiff Check and LOSTHILLS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by LOSTHILLS. The MVP of this match was sinister.
LOSTHILLS analytics
The team LOSTHILLS secured 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LOSTHILLS were sinister contributed 19 kills and VulcaN contributed 14 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7035 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LOSTHILLS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Wiff Check analytics
The team Wiff Check managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Wiff Check were resh0_o contributed 16 kills and Duw- contributed 11 kills. 5973 of total damage by Wiff Check could not prevent LOSTHILLS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Wiff Check struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments