0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Percentage of headshots
41%15%
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
Damage (total/round)
38273
Player score (round)
35991011
Player score (round)
34881011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
64%
Vertigo
63%
Inferno
35%
Anubis
35%
Nuke
11%
Mirage
7%
Overpass
4%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
36%
28
11
Vertigo
0%
0
54
Inferno
25%
8
30
Anubis
28%
18
9
Nuke
54%
13
26
Mirage
56%
27
18
Overpass
42%
19
9
Last 5 maps
Ancient
100%
1
63
Vertigo
63%
27
4
Inferno
60%
10
34
Anubis
63%
32
20
Nuke
65%
23
9
Mirage
63%
24
5
Overpass
46%
13
26
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of W7M vs paiN by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between W7M and paiN, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by paiN. The MVP of this match was nqz.
paiN analytics
The team paiN secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for paiN were nqz contributed 17 kills and Snow contributed 14 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6575 overall damage.
On the defensive side, paiN held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
W7M analytics
The team W7M managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for W7M were zede contributed 10 kills and t9rnay contributed 8 kills. 3783 of total damage by W7M could not prevent paiN from securing the victory
On the defensive side, W7M struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments