0 Comments
123
118
22
+5
360
20:16
33
0
Nuke6
+4%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- —
- —
- —
- —
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
56%
Overpass
40%
Vertigo
27%
Inferno
26%
Nuke
25%
Dust II
23%
Mirage
6%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
56%
18
0
Overpass
0%
2
11
Vertigo
60%
20
0
Inferno
41%
17
1
Nuke
50%
24
1
Dust II
27%
11
2
Mirage
56%
9
9
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
14
Overpass
40%
5
7
Vertigo
33%
3
5
Inferno
67%
15
0
Nuke
25%
12
3
Dust II
50%
10
2
Mirage
50%
12
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlllw
- lwlll
Info
Match analysis of VP.Prodigy vs Nemiga by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between VP.Prodigy and Nemiga, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by VP.Prodigy. The MVP of this match was latt1kk.
VP.Prodigy analytics
The team VP.Prodigy secured 0 out of 36 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for VP.Prodigy were latt1kk contributed 35 kills and r3salt contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 13526 overall damage.
On the defensive side, VP.Prodigy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Nemiga analytics
The team Nemiga managed to secure 36 out of 36 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Nemiga were BELCHONOKK contributed 31 kills and iDISBALANCE contributed 30 kills. 12951 of total damage by Nemiga could not prevent VP.Prodigy from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Nemiga struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments