0 Comments
52
40
19
+12
340
8:7
9
0
+4%
Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
50%
Inferno
G
40%
Mirage
G
40%
Anubis
38%
Nuke
17%
Dust II
0%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
50%
8
2
Inferno
0%
1
15
Mirage
60%
5
3
Anubis
71%
21
0
Nuke
50%
10
1
Dust II
0%
1
0
Ancient
50%
22
3
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Inferno
40%
5
0
Mirage
100%
2
1
Anubis
33%
9
0
Nuke
33%
3
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Ancient
50%
8
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwllw
- wwwww
Info
Map Analysis of VP.Prodigy vs Grindas by the Bo3.gg Team
VP.Prodigy on Anubis Analysis
VP.Prodigy demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for VP.Prodigy on Anubis were KusMe, who contributed 16 kills, and Something, who added 12 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 5433 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, VP.Prodigy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Grindas on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Grindas, as they managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Grindas on Anubis included slokkerR, who contributed 13 kills, and MAGILA, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4884 total damage, Grindas couldn't prevent VP.Prodigy from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Grindas struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments