0 Comments
Teams advantage Vertigo (M1)
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
43%
Nuke
42%
Overpass
38%
Dust II
33%
Ancient
19%
Vertigo
12%
Inferno
8%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
43%
7
10
Nuke
53%
19
1
Overpass
0%
2
12
Dust II
33%
12
2
Ancient
59%
17
0
Vertigo
55%
20
0
Inferno
33%
18
1
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
0
Nuke
11%
9
0
Overpass
38%
8
0
Dust II
0%
1
0
Ancient
40%
5
0
Vertigo
43%
7
0
Inferno
25%
8
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllll
- llllw
Info
Map Analysis of VP.Prodigy vs EPIC DUDES by the Bo3.gg Team
VP.Prodigy on Vertigo Analysis
VP.Prodigy demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 0 out of 42 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for VP.Prodigy on Vertigo were cheerful, who contributed 41 kills, and r3salt, who added 30 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 16662 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, VP.Prodigy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
EPIC DUDES on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for EPIC DUDES, as they managed to secure 42 out of 42 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for EPIC DUDES on Vertigo included devus, who contributed 33 kills, and giM, who added 29 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 15358 total damage, EPIC DUDES couldn't prevent VP.Prodigy from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, EPIC DUDES struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 21 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments