0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6.1
5.6
Ancient0.5
Win Rounds
16
13
Ancient3
Kills
98
91
Ancient7
Damage
10.7K
9.71K
Ancient983
Economy
635.5K
648.75K
Ancient-13250
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
50%
Overpass
1
33%
Mirage
31%
Inferno
1
26%
Ancient
1
24%
Dust II
7%
Vertigo
1
4%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
50%
24
1
Overpass
0%
2
11
Mirage
56%
9
9
Inferno
41%
17
1
Ancient
56%
18
0
Dust II
27%
11
2
Vertigo
60%
20
0
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
14
Overpass
33%
9
1
Mirage
25%
4
8
Inferno
67%
15
1
Ancient
80%
10
0
Dust II
20%
5
8
Vertigo
64%
11
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlllw
- lwlwl
Info
Match analysis of VP.Prodigy vs 1PIN by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between VP.Prodigy and 1PIN, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by VP.Prodigy. The MVP of this match was Fen2k.
VP.Prodigy analytics
The team VP.Prodigy secured 0 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for VP.Prodigy were Fen2k contributed 20 kills and r3salt contributed 25 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10698 overall damage.
On the defensive side, VP.Prodigy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
1PIN analytics
The team 1PIN managed to secure 29 out of 29 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for 1PIN were dox contributed 21 kills and AZUWU contributed 20 kills. 9715 of total damage by 1PIN could not prevent VP.Prodigy from securing the victory
On the defensive side, 1PIN struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments