0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.92
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.92
Player score (round)
40921012
Player score (round)
39671012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Molotov damage (total/round)
10023.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
60%
Ancient
57%
Inferno
42%
Anubis
40%
Overpass
38%
Nuke
17%
Dust II
0%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
5
Ancient
0%
2
2
Inferno
75%
4
0
Anubis
0%
0
6
Overpass
0%
2
1
Nuke
33%
3
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Last 5 maps
Mirage
60%
5
2
Ancient
57%
14
1
Inferno
33%
9
1
Anubis
40%
5
4
Overpass
38%
13
2
Nuke
50%
10
2
Dust II
0%
0
1
Vertigo
0%
2
11
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of VISU vs Sampi by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between VISU and Sampi, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Overpass, Inferno, Ancient, and victory was secured by Sampi. The MVP of this match was Jelo.
Sampi analytics
The team Sampi secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sampi were T4GG3D contributed 65 kills and The eLiVe contributed 53 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 31382 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sampi held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
VISU analytics
The team VISU managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for VISU were Jelo contributed 74 kills and LYNXi contributed 61 kills. 31922 of total damage by VISU could not prevent Sampi from securing the victory
On the defensive side, VISU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments