0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Assists on a map
12.964.4746
Speed Round (sec)
00:22s01:55s
Player score (round)
36321010
Player score (round)
36341010
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
59%
Vertigo
58%
Inferno
56%
Anubis
54%
Nuke
25%
Dust II
17%
Ancient
12%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
8%
13
8
Vertigo
58%
24
0
Inferno
56%
16
1
Anubis
21%
19
3
Nuke
25%
8
1
Dust II
33%
6
2
Ancient
55%
40
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
67%
3
0
Vertigo
0%
0
5
Inferno
0%
3
3
Anubis
75%
4
0
Nuke
0%
2
4
Dust II
50%
4
0
Ancient
43%
7
0
Info
Match analysis of Viperio vs Meteor by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Viperio and Meteor, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by Viperio. The MVP of this match was rinn.
Viperio analytics
The team Viperio secured 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Viperio were zodi contributed 21 kills and Swicher contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9315 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Viperio held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Meteor analytics
The team Meteor managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Meteor were rinn contributed 20 kills and for2na contributed 19 kills. 9385 of total damage by Meteor could not prevent Viperio from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Meteor struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments