0 Comments
95
108
33
-13
348
15:15
23
2
Anubis6
-7%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Player score (round)
41701010
Player score (round)
37121010
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
38391010
Damage (total/round)
39573
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
51%
Nuke
44%
Vertigo
27%
Mirage
17%
Anubis
7%
Ancient
5%
Inferno
2%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
25%
4
0
Nuke
44%
16
1
Vertigo
33%
12
2
Mirage
33%
3
10
Anubis
38%
21
2
Ancient
50%
40
0
Inferno
69%
13
1
Last 5 maps
Dust II
76%
21
0
Nuke
0%
0
15
Vertigo
60%
10
7
Mirage
50%
12
4
Anubis
45%
22
4
Ancient
55%
20
1
Inferno
67%
15
0
Info
Match analysis of Viperio vs kONO by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Viperio and kONO, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Viperio. The MVP of this match was AwaykeN.
Viperio analytics
The team Viperio secured 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Viperio were AwaykeN contributed 32 kills and zodi contributed 24 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11305 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Viperio held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
kONO analytics
The team kONO managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for kONO were s4ltovsk1yy contributed 23 kills and Polbandana contributed 20 kills. 10446 of total damage by kONO could not prevent Viperio from securing the victory
On the defensive side, kONO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments