Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3014
Galil kills on a map
41.8164
Player score (round)
36441010
Damage (total/round)
39873
Player score (round)
35491010
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
AWP kills on a map
216.4049
Damage (total/round)
42573
Player score (round)
47841010
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
73%
Mirage
42%
Vertigo
33%
Dust II
25%
Anubis
25%
Nuke
7%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
73%
11
1
Mirage
14%
7
7
Vertigo
47%
17
0
Dust II
25%
4
0
Anubis
25%
16
2
Nuke
40%
10
1
Ancient
56%
39
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
2
Mirage
56%
9
0
Vertigo
14%
7
0
Dust II
0%
2
0
Anubis
50%
4
6
Nuke
33%
3
2
Ancient
56%
9
1
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Viperio vs GODSENT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Viperio and GODSENT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Mirage, Vertigo, and victory was secured by GODSENT. The MVP of this match was Licale.
GODSENT analytics
The team GODSENT secured 29 out of 62 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Mirage. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GODSENT were Licale contributed 49 kills and MaiL09 contributed 46 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21487 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GODSENT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Viperio analytics
The team Viperio managed to secure 33 out of 62 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 9 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Viperio were AwaykeN contributed 48 kills and dezt contributed 44 kills. 21745 of total damage by Viperio could not prevent GODSENT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Viperio struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments