Vikings KR Scoreboard Anubis (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

13

2

+8

81

4:2

6

1

7.4

+32%

20

18

3

+2

85

3:2

5

0

6.6

+12%

12

16

6

-4

62

5:4

3

0

5.5

-13%

13

13

3

0

57

1:2

4

0

5.3

-8%

11

15

4

-4

58

0:1

2

0

5.1

-19%

Total

77

75

18

+2

344

13:11

20

1

6.0

+1%

Galorys Scoreboard Anubis (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

16

2

+1

81

2:1

4

2

6.7

+8%

13

13

3

0

70

2:0

3

1

6.2

0%

19

14

1

+5

67

1:3

5

0

6.1

+9%

15

18

7

-3

75

2:5

4

0

5.4

-4%

11

16

5

-5

59

4:4

2

0

5.1

-10%

Total

75

77

18

-2

351

11:13

18

3

5.9

0%

Teams advantage Anubis (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of Vikings KR vs Galorys by the Bo3.gg Team

Vikings KR on Anubis Analysis

Vikings KR demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Vikings KR on Anubis were remix, who contributed 21 kills, and zmb, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8256 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Vikings KR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Galorys on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Galorys, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Galorys on Anubis included tomate, who contributed 17 kills, and happ, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8426 total damage, Galorys couldn't prevent Vikings KR from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Galorys struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date