Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.62
AK47 kills on a map
226.732
AK47 damage (avg/round)
67.325.3
Player score (round)
36171012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
Molotov damage (total/round)
9523.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
83%
Nuke
67%
Mirage
60%
Vertigo
50%
Dust II
17%
Inferno
12%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
83%
6
4
Nuke
33%
9
10
Mirage
60%
5
14
Vertigo
75%
16
2
Dust II
50%
14
8
Inferno
62%
13
1
Ancient
0%
1
20
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
3
Nuke
100%
2
0
Mirage
0%
0
3
Vertigo
25%
4
0
Dust II
67%
3
1
Inferno
50%
4
0
Ancient
0%
0
6
Info
Match analysis of VERTEX vs Rooster by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between VERTEX and Rooster, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, Dust II, and victory was secured by VERTEX. The MVP of this match was pz.
VERTEX analytics
The team VERTEX secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Dust II. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for VERTEX were pz contributed 40 kills and malta contributed 44 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21651 overall damage.
On the defensive side, VERTEX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Rooster analytics
The team Rooster managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Rooster were asap contributed 43 kills and dangeR contributed 37 kills. 17395 of total damage by Rooster could not prevent VERTEX from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Rooster struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments