Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:23s01:28s
AK47 kills on a map
156.7456
AK47 damage (avg/round)
65.225.4
Galil kills on a map
41.8115
Galil damage (avg/round)
21.35.6
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
3612.5
Smoke thrown on a map
2415.0791
Percentage of headshots
41%15%
USP damage (avg/round)
16.84.6
Shots (total/round)
8516
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
81%
Vertigo
71%
Mirage
64%
Inferno
60%
Overpass
55%
Anubis
40%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
81%
16
2
Vertigo
71%
14
0
Mirage
64%
11
13
Inferno
60%
10
6
Overpass
55%
11
4
Anubis
40%
5
12
Ancient
0%
0
23
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
3
0
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Mirage
0%
0
3
Inferno
0%
1
1
Overpass
0%
1
1
Anubis
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of VERTEX vs KZG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between VERTEX and KZG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Inferno, and victory was secured by VERTEX. The MVP of this match was HaZR.
VERTEX analytics
The team VERTEX secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for VERTEX were HaZR contributed 35 kills and ADDICT contributed 29 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 14394 overall damage.
On the defensive side, VERTEX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
KZG analytics
The team KZG managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for KZG were MSK contributed 22 kills and pain contributed 21 kills. 11690 of total damage by KZG could not prevent VERTEX from securing the victory
On the defensive side, KZG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments