0 Comments
44
71
10
-27
295
8:9
9
0
Inferno5.2
-22%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
59%
Inferno
53%
Mirage
49%
Anubis
39%
Vertigo
16%
Nuke
12%
Ancient
8%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
2
2
Inferno
100%
5
3
Mirage
0%
0
10
Anubis
33%
12
1
Vertigo
40%
5
2
Nuke
45%
11
2
Ancient
8%
12
2
Last 5 maps
Overpass
41%
27
33
Inferno
47%
34
8
Mirage
49%
49
8
Anubis
72%
50
1
Vertigo
56%
25
26
Nuke
57%
40
4
Ancient
0%
0
71
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwllw
- wlwww
Info
Match analysis of Verdant vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Verdant and Zero Tenacity, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Verdant. The MVP of this match was wolfie.
Verdant analytics
The team Verdant secured 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Verdant were wolfie contributed 17 kills and Extinct contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7271 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Verdant held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were brutmonster contributed 9 kills and simke contributed 10 kills. 5019 of total damage by Zero Tenacity could not prevent Verdant from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments