0 Comments
71
58
20
+13
367
11:10
18
1
+5%
Teams advantage Nuke (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
48%
Nuke
20%
Anubis
18%
Inferno
17%
Ancient
17%
Overpass
10%
Vertigo
1%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
2
6
Nuke
44%
18
3
Anubis
44%
18
1
Inferno
75%
4
3
Ancient
17%
18
3
Overpass
60%
5
3
Vertigo
48%
23
2
Last 5 maps
Mirage
48%
31
20
Nuke
64%
28
5
Anubis
62%
61
0
Inferno
58%
26
13
Ancient
0%
0
68
Overpass
50%
26
29
Vertigo
47%
32
13
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlllw
- wwwww
Info
Map Analysis of Verdant vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Nuke Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Nuke were nEMANHA, who contributed 20 kills, and Cjoffo, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 7697 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Verdant on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Verdant, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Verdant on Nuke included arTisT, who contributed 16 kills, and Vacancy, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6237 total damage, Verdant couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, Verdant struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments