0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
74.491
M4A1 kills on a map
114.491
Galil kills on a map
31.8171
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3023
GLOCK kills on a map
21.4456
Assists on a map
8.684.4098
Trades on a map
6.443.4638
Speed Round (sec)
00:30s01:55s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Nuke
56%
Vertigo
33%
Mirage
29%
Ancient
8%
Inferno
5%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
2
Nuke
56%
32
1
Vertigo
58%
33
1
Mirage
25%
8
7
Ancient
47%
30
3
Inferno
33%
6
4
Anubis
48%
23
2
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
2
0
Nuke
0%
1
10
Vertigo
25%
12
3
Mirage
54%
28
0
Ancient
39%
33
0
Inferno
38%
8
4
Anubis
48%
23
3
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Verdant vs NOM by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Verdant and NOM, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Verdant. The MVP of this match was arTisT.
Verdant analytics
The team Verdant secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Verdant were arTisT contributed 15 kills and Girafffe contributed 13 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6307 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Verdant held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
NOM analytics
The team NOM managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for NOM were m4tthi contributed 10 kills and dan1 contributed 8 kills. 3865 of total damage by NOM could not prevent Verdant from securing the victory
On the defensive side, NOM struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments