0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
74.491
M4A1 kills on a map
114.491
Galil kills on a map
31.8171
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3023
GLOCK kills on a map
21.4456
Assists on a map
8.684.4098
Trades on a map
6.443.4638
Speed Round (sec)
00:30s01:55s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Nuke
56%
Vertigo
33%
Mirage
29%
Ancient
8%
Inferno
5%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
2
Nuke
56%
32
1
Vertigo
58%
33
1
Mirage
25%
8
7
Ancient
47%
30
3
Inferno
33%
6
4
Anubis
48%
23
2
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
2
0
Nuke
0%
1
10
Vertigo
25%
12
3
Mirage
54%
28
0
Ancient
39%
33
0
Inferno
38%
8
4
Anubis
48%
23
3
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Verdant vs NOM by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Verdant and NOM, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Verdant. The MVP of this match was arTisT.
Verdant analytics
The team Verdant secured 13 out of 14 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Verdant were arTisT contributed 15 kills and Girafffe contributed 13 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6307 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Verdant held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
NOM analytics
The team NOM managed to secure 1 out of 14 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for NOM were m4tthi contributed 10 kills and dan1 contributed 8 kills. 3865 of total damage by NOM could not prevent Verdant from securing the victory
On the defensive side, NOM struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments