0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:33s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:33s01:25s
Smoke thrown on a map
3214.5022
Player score (round)
41261010
Player score (round)
36651010
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
3
HE damage (total/round)
17326.2
AK47 kills on a map
126.5019
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
58%
Inferno
57%
Ancient
54%
Dust II
33%
Nuke
31%
Mirage
20%
Vertigo
17%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
75%
4
7
Inferno
100%
1
19
Ancient
0%
5
10
Dust II
33%
6
2
Nuke
45%
11
7
Mirage
20%
5
12
Vertigo
60%
5
12
Last 5 maps
Anubis
17%
6
11
Inferno
43%
7
4
Ancient
54%
13
1
Dust II
0%
0
7
Nuke
14%
7
16
Mirage
0%
0
24
Vertigo
43%
7
7
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Vantage vs KZG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Vantage and KZG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Anubis, Nuke, Ancient, and victory was secured by Vantage. The MVP of this match was Drox.
Vantage analytics
The team Vantage secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Vantage were Drox contributed 56 kills and nauh contributed 49 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 24749 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Vantage held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
KZG analytics
The team KZG managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for KZG were dpr contributed 59 kills and KZXL contributed 48 kills. 25154 of total damage by KZG could not prevent Vantage from securing the victory
On the defensive side, KZG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments