0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
84.5517
GLOCK kills on a map
21.4429
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3025
M4A1 kills on a map
84.5517
GLOCK kills on a map
21.4429
GLOCK kills on a map
21.4429
Assists on a map
7.954.3808
Openning kills on a map
62.8849
Player score (round)
38861011
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
100%
Ancient
63%
Nuke
61%
Inferno
30%
Overpass
29%
Vertigo
25%
Anubis
9%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
1
Ancient
0%
0
2
Nuke
0%
0
1
Inferno
0%
0
2
Overpass
67%
3
0
Vertigo
50%
6
0
Anubis
67%
6
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
1
27
Ancient
63%
35
4
Nuke
61%
18
5
Inferno
30%
10
6
Overpass
38%
8
17
Vertigo
75%
16
1
Anubis
58%
19
6
Info
Match analysis of V1dar vs FTW by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between V1dar and FTW, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by V1dar. The MVP of this match was lom1k.
V1dar analytics
The team V1dar secured 13 out of 15 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for V1dar were lom1k contributed 17 kills and torox- contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7021 overall damage.
On the defensive side, V1dar held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
FTW analytics
The team FTW managed to secure 2 out of 15 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for FTW were PR contributed 11 kills and aragornN contributed 10 kills. 4500 of total damage by FTW could not prevent V1dar from securing the victory
On the defensive side, FTW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments