0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:28s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
34841010
Damage (total/round)
41073
Player score (round)
51031010
Player score (round)
35391010
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Knife kills
11
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
50%
Inferno
44%
Anubis
44%
Nuke
16%
Dust II
14%
Mirage
13%
Ancient
2%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
50%
18
12
Inferno
0%
1
30
Anubis
77%
52
2
Nuke
41%
32
6
Dust II
41%
22
10
Mirage
59%
41
2
Ancient
51%
49
5
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
5
Inferno
44%
9
3
Anubis
33%
18
0
Nuke
57%
7
2
Dust II
55%
11
0
Mirage
72%
18
0
Ancient
53%
19
2
Info
Match analysis of UNiTY vs TNL by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between UNiTY and TNL, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by UNiTY. The MVP of this match was K1-FiDa.
UNiTY analytics
The team UNiTY secured 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for UNiTY were K1-FiDa contributed 16 kills and Blogg1s contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7661 overall damage.
On the defensive side, UNiTY held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
TNL analytics
The team TNL managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for TNL were emo-- contributed 16 kills and yukitoro contributed 16 kills. 6747 of total damage by TNL could not prevent UNiTY from securing the victory
On the defensive side, TNL struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments