0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4516
USP kills on a map
41.5986
M4A1 kills on a map
114.3478
Speed Round (sec)
00:26s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
40073
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
77%
Nuke
59%
Vertigo
53%
Ancient
51%
Mirage
46%
Dust II
41%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
77%
56
2
Nuke
41%
34
6
Vertigo
53%
19
12
Ancient
51%
53
5
Mirage
54%
41
2
Dust II
41%
22
10
Inferno
0%
0
30
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
1
0
Nuke
100%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Mirage
100%
1
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Info
Match analysis of UNiTY vs Daystar by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between UNiTY and Daystar, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Daystar. The MVP of this match was Stesso.
Daystar analytics
The team Daystar secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Daystar were Stesso contributed 20 kills and bekk3R contributed 14 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8360 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Daystar held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
UNiTY analytics
The team UNiTY managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for UNiTY were Pechyn contributed 14 kills and Blogg1s contributed 18 kills. 8154 of total damage by UNiTY could not prevent Daystar from securing the victory
On the defensive side, UNiTY struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments