Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
Speed Round (sec)
00:21s01:55s
Player score (round)
34821010
Player score (round)
38581010
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Zeus kills
1
Zeus kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
64%
Inferno
56%
Anubis
25%
Nuke
19%
Vertigo
12%
Ancient
5%
Mirage
1%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
36%
11
2
Inferno
0%
1
19
Anubis
69%
61
5
Nuke
36%
33
2
Vertigo
62%
21
4
Ancient
52%
52
5
Mirage
45%
22
3
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
11
Inferno
56%
9
6
Anubis
44%
18
1
Nuke
55%
20
5
Vertigo
50%
10
2
Ancient
57%
53
0
Mirage
46%
28
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwll
- lllll
Info
Match analysis of UNiTY vs CPH Wolves by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between UNiTY and CPH Wolves, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by UNiTY. The MVP of this match was Tapewaare.
UNiTY analytics
The team UNiTY secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for UNiTY were Levi contributed 16 kills and K1-FiDa contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9005 overall damage.
On the defensive side, UNiTY held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
CPH Wolves analytics
The team CPH Wolves managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for CPH Wolves were Tapewaare contributed 20 kills and BøghmagiC contributed 13 kills. 7707 of total damage by CPH Wolves could not prevent UNiTY from securing the victory
On the defensive side, CPH Wolves struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments