Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:22s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:35s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:30s01:25s
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
44.416.3
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.64.1
USP kills on a map
41.6027
USP damage (avg/round)
16.84.8
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
12.74.1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
58%
Mirage
35%
Anubis
21%
Nuke
19%
Dust II
7%
Ancient
6%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
58%
24
9
Mirage
55%
38
4
Anubis
71%
62
3
Nuke
44%
41
4
Dust II
40%
20
5
Ancient
61%
54
5
Inferno
0%
0
24
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
2
0
Mirage
20%
10
1
Anubis
50%
6
3
Nuke
25%
8
0
Dust II
33%
3
4
Ancient
55%
11
0
Inferno
0%
0
6
Info
Match analysis of UNiTY vs Anonymo by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between UNiTY and Anonymo, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by UNiTY. The MVP of this match was Levi.
UNiTY analytics
The team UNiTY secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for UNiTY were Levi contributed 34 kills and Blogg1s contributed 30 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16595 overall damage.
On the defensive side, UNiTY held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Anonymo analytics
The team Anonymo managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Anonymo were Nami contributed 33 kills and eltrzzi contributed 32 kills. 14770 of total damage by Anonymo could not prevent UNiTY from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Anonymo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments