0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
5.5
6.2
Vertigo0.7
Win Rounds
12
16
Vertigo4
Kills
84
96
Vertigo12
Damage
9.48K
10.35K
Vertigo862
Economy
580.65K
602.3K
Vertigo21650
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
60%
Ancient
54%
Overpass
50%
Inferno
45%
Mirage
U
33%
Anubis
33%
Vertigo
24%
Nuke
5%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
40%
5
0
Ancient
0%
0
1
Overpass
0%
3
1
Inferno
0%
1
1
Mirage
83%
6
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Vertigo
17%
6
0
Nuke
50%
6
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
4
Ancient
54%
13
3
Overpass
50%
12
3
Inferno
45%
11
6
Mirage
50%
8
7
Anubis
33%
6
1
Vertigo
41%
22
0
Nuke
55%
22
2
Info
Match analysis of Union88 vs Viperio by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Union88 and Viperio, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by Viperio. The MVP of this match was arTisT.
Viperio analytics
The team Viperio secured 0 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Viperio were arTisT contributed 22 kills and Gizmy contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10346 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Viperio held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Union88 analytics
The team Union88 managed to secure 28 out of 28 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Union88 were t1murj4N- contributed 23 kills and Maloy24 contributed 20 kills. 9484 of total damage by Union88 could not prevent Viperio from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Union88 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments