0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
41%
Inferno
36%
Ancient
28%
Nuke
23%
Mirage
12%
Overpass
3%
Vertigo
1%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
41%
22
5
Inferno
39%
18
21
Ancient
40%
35
1
Nuke
71%
14
6
Mirage
32%
22
6
Overpass
43%
7
27
Vertigo
43%
28
5
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
3
0
Inferno
75%
4
0
Ancient
68%
25
0
Nuke
48%
25
0
Mirage
20%
5
0
Overpass
40%
10
0
Vertigo
44%
16
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlll
- wlwww
Info
Match analysis of UNGENTIUM vs ThunderFlash by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between UNGENTIUM and ThunderFlash, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by ThunderFlash. The MVP of this match was Moon.
ThunderFlash analytics
The team ThunderFlash secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ThunderFlash were Moon contributed 25 kills and Mride contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9880 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ThunderFlash held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
UNGENTIUM analytics
The team UNGENTIUM managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for UNGENTIUM were m4tthi contributed 21 kills and ponczek contributed 15 kills. 9567 of total damage by UNGENTIUM could not prevent ThunderFlash from securing the victory
On the defensive side, UNGENTIUM struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments