0 Comments
143
201
28
-58
323
19:32
36
2
Mirage4.9
0%
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
80%
Overpass
67%
Ancient
67%
Anubis
67%
Nuke
50%
Inferno
38%
Vertigo
33%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
80%
5
5
Overpass
67%
3
5
Ancient
67%
6
6
Anubis
67%
9
0
Nuke
50%
2
17
Inferno
38%
8
11
Vertigo
33%
3
5
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
1
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Match analysis of TYLOO vs Octagonal Disposition by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between TYLOO and Octagonal Disposition, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by TYLOO. The MVP of this match was ROGA.
TYLOO analytics
The team TYLOO secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for TYLOO were ROGA contributed 41 kills and sk0R contributed 40 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20728 overall damage.
On the defensive side, TYLOO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Octagonal Disposition analytics
The team Octagonal Disposition managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Octagonal Disposition were rAge contributed 33 kills and RainbowGod- contributed 34 kills. 16786 of total damage by Octagonal Disposition could not prevent TYLOO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Octagonal Disposition struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments