0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
41.8161
AWP kills on a map
106.5449
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4429
M4A1 kills on a map
74.5517
USP kills on a map
31.6107
M4A1 kills on a map
74.5517
Kills on a map
2117.3379
Teammate kills
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
70%
Nuke
28%
Inferno
23%
Mirage
16%
Ancient
14%
Overpass
3%
Anubis
2%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
70%
10
10
Nuke
68%
25
2
Inferno
43%
14
6
Mirage
44%
16
9
Ancient
67%
3
33
Overpass
54%
13
9
Anubis
43%
14
12
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
16
Nuke
40%
10
5
Inferno
20%
15
3
Mirage
60%
10
11
Ancient
53%
19
2
Overpass
57%
7
15
Anubis
45%
22
2
Last results
Info
Match analysis of TYLOO vs Newhappy by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between TYLOO and Newhappy, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by TYLOO. The MVP of this match was Mercury.
TYLOO analytics
The team TYLOO secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for TYLOO were Mercury contributed 21 kills and Kaze contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7174 overall damage.
On the defensive side, TYLOO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Newhappy analytics
The team Newhappy managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Newhappy were jiejie contributed 7 kills and rAge contributed 7 kills. 4023 of total damage by Newhappy could not prevent TYLOO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Newhappy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
Comments