0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
133
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.23.8
AK47 kills on a map
186.732
AK47 damage (avg/round)
75.525.3
Trades on a map
83.5084
Multikill x-
4
Smoke thrown on a map
3015.0371
Smoke thrown on a map
3315.0371
HE damage (avg/round)
11.93.4
Eco wins full buy
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
89%
Nuke
88%
Vertigo
83%
Overpass
50%
Dust II
25%
Inferno
11%
Mirage
9%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
89%
9
3
Nuke
0%
0
29
Vertigo
83%
12
7
Overpass
50%
10
5
Dust II
100%
2
16
Inferno
71%
21
3
Mirage
71%
17
1
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
7
Nuke
88%
8
0
Vertigo
0%
1
4
Overpass
0%
0
5
Dust II
75%
4
1
Inferno
60%
10
0
Mirage
80%
5
3
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of TYLOO vs IHC by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between TYLOO and IHC, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Vertigo, and victory was secured by TYLOO. The MVP of this match was Summer.
TYLOO analytics
The team TYLOO secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for TYLOO were Summer contributed 44 kills and AttackeR contributed 42 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21964 overall damage.
On the defensive side, TYLOO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
IHC analytics
The team IHC managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for IHC were sk0R contributed 34 kills and kabal contributed 37 kills. 18075 of total damage by IHC could not prevent TYLOO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, IHC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments