0 Comments
Teams advantage Ancient (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
G
100%
Anubis
25%
Inferno
17%
Nuke
13%
Ancient
G
5%
Overpass
0%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
1
2
Anubis
63%
8
0
Inferno
17%
6
0
Nuke
33%
3
0
Ancient
45%
11
0
Overpass
50%
4
1
Vertigo
0%
0
3
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
2
2
Anubis
38%
8
0
Inferno
0%
3
4
Nuke
20%
5
0
Ancient
50%
8
0
Overpass
50%
2
2
Vertigo
0%
0
3
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlll
- lllll
Info
Map Analysis of TUSTE CHOPAKI vs Grindas by the Bo3.gg Team
Grindas on Ancient Analysis
Grindas demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Grindas on Ancient were Prochas, who contributed 28 kills, and slokkerR, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 11624 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, Grindas held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
TUSTE CHOPAKI on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for TUSTE CHOPAKI, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for TUSTE CHOPAKI on Ancient included Fugor, who contributed 26 kills, and GruBy, who added 26 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 11547 total damage, TUSTE CHOPAKI couldn't prevent Grindas from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, TUSTE CHOPAKI struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments