0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
126.5888
M4A1 kills on a map
114.491
Galil kills on a map
51.8171
Speed Round (sec)
00:33s01:55s
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
57%
Inferno
56%
Nuke
43%
Mirage
27%
Anubis
27%
Ancient
24%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
57%
21
0
Inferno
56%
9
4
Nuke
43%
23
1
Mirage
27%
15
5
Anubis
30%
27
1
Ancient
43%
28
5
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
1
Mirage
0%
2
0
Anubis
57%
7
0
Ancient
67%
9
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllwl
- wlwll
Info
Match analysis of PGE Turow vs Lausanne SE by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PGE Turow and Lausanne SE, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by PGE Turow. The MVP of this match was azizz.
PGE Turow analytics
The team PGE Turow secured 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PGE Turow were azizz contributed 25 kills and Markoś contributed 14 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7774 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PGE Turow held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Lausanne SE analytics
The team Lausanne SE managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Lausanne SE were xReal contributed 13 kills and berzerk contributed 12 kills. 6593 of total damage by Lausanne SE could not prevent PGE Turow from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Lausanne SE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments