0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:19s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:35s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:20s01:26s
HE damage (avg/round)
13.53.4
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:22s00:37s
Smoke thrown on a map
2214.6931
USP damage (avg/round)
16.34.7
Galil kills on a map
51.8171
Galil damage (avg/round)
21.55.8
Speed Round (sec)
00:34s01:55s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
58%
Vertigo
28%
Mirage
15%
Ancient
5%
Overpass
3%
Nuke
3%
Anubis
2%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
58%
24
5
Vertigo
57%
7
22
Mirage
55%
22
5
Ancient
64%
22
10
Overpass
50%
20
4
Nuke
50%
18
9
Anubis
50%
2
40
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
3
38
Vertigo
29%
17
11
Mirage
70%
20
8
Ancient
59%
29
6
Overpass
47%
19
10
Nuke
47%
15
23
Anubis
52%
27
7
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of TSM vs Sangal by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between TSM and Sangal, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by Sangal. The MVP of this match was SaMey.
Sangal analytics
The team Sangal secured 26 out of 37 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sangal were SaMey contributed 35 kills and jottAAA contributed 29 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 14454 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sangal held their ground firmly, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
TSM analytics
The team TSM managed to secure 11 out of 37 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for TSM were interz contributed 31 kills and valde contributed 26 kills. 11931 of total damage by TSM could not prevent Sangal from securing the victory
On the defensive side, TSM struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments