0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
103
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:31s01:28s
Galil damage (avg/round)
17.85.6
M4A1 kills on a map
114.6466
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
48.116.6
Galil kills on a map
51.8115
Galil damage (avg/round)
18.85.6
AK47 kills on a map
146.7456
Shots (total/round)
11916
Shots (total/round)
8516
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
100%
Overpass
67%
Inferno
58%
Mirage
53%
Vertigo
33%
Nuke
11%
Ancient
5%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
34
Overpass
67%
15
2
Inferno
42%
19
5
Mirage
53%
15
4
Vertigo
67%
6
12
Nuke
61%
18
3
Ancient
62%
21
10
Last 5 maps
Anubis
100%
3
0
Overpass
0%
0
1
Inferno
100%
3
0
Mirage
0%
1
3
Vertigo
100%
1
2
Nuke
50%
2
0
Ancient
67%
6
0
Info
Match analysis of TSM vs RUSH B by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between TSM and RUSH B, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Nuke, and victory was secured by RUSH B. The MVP of this match was interz.
RUSH B analytics
The team RUSH B secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for RUSH B were kinqie contributed 34 kills and Kiro contributed 33 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16887 overall damage.
On the defensive side, RUSH B held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
TSM analytics
The team TSM managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for TSM were interz contributed 34 kills and MoDo contributed 28 kills. 15206 of total damage by TSM could not prevent RUSH B from securing the victory
On the defensive side, TSM struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments