Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:24s
Smoke thrown on a map
2214.3232
AK47 kills on a map
136.4203
AK47 damage (avg/round)
65.125.2
HE kills on a map
21.1189
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4516
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
17.24.2
USP damage (avg/round)
13.64.8
Speed Round (sec)
00:29s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
38873
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
48%
Mirage
41%
Ancient
30%
Vertigo
20%
Inferno
8%
Dust II
0%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
48%
25
11
Mirage
58%
38
3
Ancient
59%
27
9
Vertigo
53%
15
23
Inferno
75%
36
0
Dust II
67%
12
17
Anubis
50%
4
51
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
5
Mirage
17%
6
3
Ancient
29%
7
1
Vertigo
33%
3
4
Inferno
67%
6
0
Dust II
67%
3
1
Anubis
50%
4
0
Info
Match analysis of TSM vs G2 Ares by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between TSM and G2 Ares, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Mirage, Dust II, and victory was secured by TSM. The MVP of this match was valde.
TSM analytics
The team TSM secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Dust II. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for TSM were valde contributed 34 kills and Zyphon contributed 39 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16567 overall damage.
On the defensive side, TSM held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
G2 Ares analytics
The team G2 Ares managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for G2 Ares were kl1m contributed 34 kills and xezr contributed 26 kills. 12744 of total damage by G2 Ares could not prevent TSM from securing the victory
On the defensive side, G2 Ares struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments