0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:28s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:31s01:28s
HE kills on a map
21.1254
HE damage (avg/round)
27.53.4
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4398
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
13.33.8
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.72
Smoke thrown on a map
2015.0791
HE kills on a map
21.1254
HE damage (avg/round)
15.93.4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
e
100%
Overpass
69%
Vertigo
67%
Ancient
63%
Nuke
60%
Mirage
e
46%
Inferno
44%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
28
Overpass
69%
13
2
Vertigo
67%
6
9
Ancient
63%
16
9
Nuke
60%
15
3
Mirage
54%
13
3
Inferno
44%
16
4
Last 5 maps
Anubis
100%
1
0
Overpass
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Ancient
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
2
Mirage
100%
1
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Info
Match analysis of TSM vs eHawks by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between TSM and eHawks, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Overpass, and victory was secured by TSM. The MVP of this match was CYPHER.
TSM analytics
The team TSM secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for TSM were CYPHER contributed 40 kills and valde contributed 31 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17749 overall damage.
On the defensive side, TSM held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
eHawks analytics
The team eHawks managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for eHawks were Diviiii contributed 38 kills and Wonderful_Y contributed 32 kills. 15542 of total damage by eHawks could not prevent TSM from securing the victory
On the defensive side, eHawks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments