Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
16.53.4
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
5428
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
HE damage (avg/round)
13.73.4
Assists on a map
104.4315
Player score (round)
35181010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
HE damage (total/round)
10826.2
HE damage (total/round)
9326.2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Vertigo
75%
Ancient
28%
Inferno
23%
Anubis
22%
Mirage
21%
Nuke
4%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
3
Vertigo
75%
4
13
Ancient
70%
10
1
Inferno
73%
11
1
Anubis
67%
3
20
Mirage
54%
13
4
Nuke
29%
7
8
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
1
27
Ancient
42%
12
5
Inferno
50%
6
6
Anubis
45%
11
10
Mirage
33%
18
5
Nuke
33%
9
13
Info
Match analysis of TSM vs 500 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between TSM and 500, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Vertigo, Mirage, Ancient, and victory was secured by TSM. The MVP of this match was niko.
TSM analytics
The team TSM secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for TSM were niko contributed 47 kills and acoR contributed 44 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22500 overall damage.
On the defensive side, TSM held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
500 analytics
The team 500 managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for 500 were SHiPZ contributed 53 kills and Rainwaker contributed 45 kills. 21256 of total damage by 500 could not prevent TSM from securing the victory
On the defensive side, 500 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments