0 Comments
117
99
39
+18
371
19:16
29
1
+6%
Teams advantage Dust II (M1)
Records Dust II
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
8830
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.62
Flash duration on a map (sec)
02:33s00:39s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
10930
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
12230
Flash duration on a map (sec)
02:12s00:39s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
12030
Speed Round (sec)
00:33s01:54s
Player score (round)
35451012
Damage (total/round)
42273
Info
Map Analysis of Triumph vs Bad News Bears by the Bo3.gg Team
Bad News Bears on Dust II Analysis
Bad News Bears demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 19 out of 35 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Bad News Bears on Dust II were tarik, who contributed 28 kills, and Shakezullah, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 12986 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Bad News Bears held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Triumph on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Triumph, as they managed to secure 16 out of 35 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Triumph on Dust II included RZU, who contributed 29 kills, and cynic, who added 21 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 11314 total damage, Triumph couldn't prevent Bad News Bears from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Triumph struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments