ONET4P Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

19

10

0

95

3:2

6

0

6.7

+19%

16

20

3

-4

64

3:4

3

0

5.8

-4%

13

21

9

-8

77

3:3

3

0

5.8

-12%

15

18

4

-3

69

0:5

4

1

5.3

+22%

12

20

4

-8

67

1:0

1

0

5.3

-11%

Total

75

98

30

-23

371

10:14

17

1

5.8

+3%

GGPR Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

32

13

8

+19

125

4:2

9

1

9.4

+51%

16

18

7

-2

92

3:1

3

0

6.7

-5%

16

14

6

+2

75

3:1

4

1

6.4

+3%

18

16

3

+2

71

3:2

6

0

6.1

-6%

14

16

3

-2

65

1:4

3

0

5.4

+4%

Total

96

77

27

+19

428

14:10

25

2

6.8

+9%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of ONET4P vs GGPR by the Bo3.gg Team

GGPR on Inferno Analysis

GGPR demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for GGPR on Inferno were lowrider, who contributed 32 kills, and BeaKie, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10267 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, GGPR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


ONET4P on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for ONET4P, as they managed to secure 8 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for ONET4P on Inferno included Fr3nk1e, who contributed 19 kills, and Just2EZ, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8902 total damage, ONET4P couldn't prevent GGPR from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, ONET4P struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date