ONET4P Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

15

2

+8

80

2:5

7

2

7.0

+18%

17

22

6

-5

79

1:0

4

1

6.3

-13%

17

20

2

-3

68

2:1

4

0

5.8

-5%

15

22

4

-7

76

6:4

3

0

5.7

-3%

17

20

4

-3

68

2:3

6

0

5.6

-5%

Total

89

99

18

-10

371

13:13

24

3

6.1

-2%

ChocoCheck Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

25

17

5

+8

102

4:3

7

3

8.2

+16%

21

18

5

+3

85

5:2

7

0

6.7

+12%

21

18

5

+3

82

2:3

6

0

6.3

+7%

18

15

4

+3

78

1:3

4

0

6.1

+4%

12

21

4

-9

59

1:2

2

0

4.8

-22%

Total

97

89

23

+8

405

13:13

26

3

6.4

+3%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of ONET4P vs ChocoCheck by the Bo3.gg Team

ChocoCheck on Inferno Analysis

ChocoCheck demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for ChocoCheck on Inferno were XotiC, who contributed 25 kills, and nosraC, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10527 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, ChocoCheck held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


ONET4P on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for ONET4P, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for ONET4P on Inferno included walker, who contributed 23 kills, and JDubs, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9642 total damage, ONET4P couldn't prevent ChocoCheck from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, ONET4P struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date