Teams advantage
Score
5.7
6.5
Dust II0
Win Rounds
25
30
Dust II0
Kills
184
208
Dust II0
Damage
20.67K
22.07K
Dust II0
Economy
1.01M
1.15M
Dust II0
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
T
76%
Nuke
74%
Ancient
48%
Inferno
T
46%
Overpass
27%
Vertigo
0%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
2
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Inferno
100%
2
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Vertigo
50%
2
0
Mirage
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
24%
21
6
Nuke
74%
23
4
Ancient
48%
48
1
Inferno
54%
28
2
Overpass
27%
11
13
Vertigo
50%
20
1
Mirage
0%
0
20
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Trinity vs PACT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Trinity and PACT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Inferno, Dust II, and victory was secured by PACT. The MVP of this match was fr3nd.
PACT analytics
The team PACT secured 65 out of 65 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PACT were fr3nd contributed 55 kills and Bielany contributed 50 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22071 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PACT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 25 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Trinity analytics
The team Trinity managed to secure 0 out of 65 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Trinity were xAHEN contributed 43 kills and 7kick contributed 40 kills. 20672 of total damage by Trinity could not prevent PACT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Trinity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments