0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.22
HE damage (avg/round)
11.13.4
Molotov damage (avg/round)
72
USP kills on a map
41.616
Player score (round)
44271012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
100%
Mirage
89%
Vertigo
71%
Nuke
67%
Overpass
43%
Dust II
20%
Inferno
3%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
33
Mirage
11%
9
13
Vertigo
29%
14
3
Nuke
67%
18
0
Overpass
43%
21
1
Dust II
20%
5
18
Inferno
47%
15
9
Last 5 maps
Ancient
100%
1
0
Mirage
100%
1
0
Vertigo
100%
1
1
Nuke
0%
1
0
Overpass
0%
0
2
Dust II
0%
0
1
Inferno
50%
2
0
Info
Match analysis of Tricked vs GMT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Tricked and GMT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Nuke, Inferno, and victory was secured by GMT. The MVP of this match was PR1mE.
GMT analytics
The team GMT secured 39 out of 72 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Inferno. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GMT were ProbLeM contributed 58 kills and DavCost contributed 49 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 26485 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GMT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 21 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Tricked analytics
The team Tricked managed to secure 33 out of 72 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 7 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Tricked were PR1mE contributed 60 kills and larsen contributed 45 kills. 25286 of total damage by Tricked could not prevent GMT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Tricked struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 20 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments