0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
103
AK47 kills on a map
136.732
USP damage (avg/round)
15.44.6
Deagle damage (avg/round)
18.55.4
Molotov damage (total/round)
8823.8
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4398
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
15.93.8
USP kills on a map
41.616
USP damage (avg/round)
154.6
Deagle kills on a map
51.6964
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
64%
Vertigo
25%
Nuke
25%
Overpass
23%
Ancient
15%
Inferno
11%
Mirage
11%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
25%
8
22
Vertigo
25%
12
16
Nuke
56%
18
1
Overpass
42%
24
5
Ancient
50%
4
26
Inferno
37%
19
11
Mirage
33%
12
12
Last 5 maps
Dust II
89%
9
15
Vertigo
0%
0
35
Nuke
31%
13
11
Overpass
65%
17
8
Ancient
65%
20
4
Inferno
48%
27
1
Mirage
44%
9
24
Info
Match analysis of Tricked vs AVE by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Tricked and AVE, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Inferno, and victory was secured by Tricked. The MVP of this match was PR1mE.
Tricked analytics
The team Tricked secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Tricked were PR1mE contributed 40 kills and kiR contributed 39 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19124 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Tricked held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
AVE analytics
The team AVE managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for AVE were sugaR contributed 40 kills and Raijin contributed 32 kills. 15212 of total damage by AVE could not prevent Tricked from securing the victory
On the defensive side, AVE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments