0 Comments
52
77
20
-25
301
7:13
13
1
Vertigo5.2
0%
Teams advantage
Score
5.2
6.6
Vertigo1.5
Win Rounds
7
13
Vertigo6
Kills
53
77
Vertigo24
Damage
6.07K
7.95K
Vertigo1874
Economy
384.2K
441.95K
Vertigo57750
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Openning kills on a map
82.8624
Assists on a map
104.4098
Teammate kills
1
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
67%
Ancient
T
67%
Vertigo
33%
Mirage
0%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
0
Ancient
67%
3
0
Vertigo
0%
3
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
3
0
Last 5 maps
Nuke
67%
3
0
Ancient
0%
2
0
Vertigo
33%
6
0
Mirage
0%
2
0
Anubis
0%
3
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlwl
- lwwll
Info
Match analysis of TopTab Club vs Genk by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between TopTab Club and Genk, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by Genk. The MVP of this match was Crepow.
Genk analytics
The team Genk secured 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Genk were Crepow contributed 21 kills and Wumbo contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7899 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Genk held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
TopTab Club analytics
The team TopTab Club managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for TopTab Club were maQuein contributed 13 kills and ADntZzZz contributed 13 kills. 6010 of total damage by TopTab Club could not prevent Genk from securing the victory
On the defensive side, TopTab Club struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments